We are happy to share that FTV has been ranked among the top 20 (out of 278) growth equity firms globally in the 2024 HEC Paris Dow Jones Growth Capital Private Equity Performance Ranking. The ranking highlights the top-performing growth equity firms worldwide across funds raised between 2011 and 2020. FTV was also among the top 20 firms on the 2023 list, which was the first time this dedicated growth equity list was introduced.
The data-driven nature of this ranking, which draws on a comprehensive set of performance metrics, makes us particularly proud to be on this list alongside such a strong cohort of growth equity firms. We believe this ranking validates our strategy, which leverages our deep domain expertise, thematic sourcing approach, expansive Global Partner Network® and robust value creation platform.
Notably, this year’s ranking saw increased global competition – a testament to the growing depth and dynamism of the growth equity landscape. HEC evaluated comprehensive performance data from 278 growth capital firms (up from 106 firms the year prior), spanning 505 funds raised over a decade, to produce the list of the top 20 global growth capital firms. The analysis aggregates performance across vintage years, considering both relative and absolute returns.
We are honored that FTV continues to be recognized for our top performance as the industry continues to expand.
Further detail on the ranking, including the methodology for selection, can be found here.
Disclosures
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Reference to an award is only one piece of information relevant to an evaluation of an investment adviser such as FTV Capital. Recognition presented herein is from third parties that are not affiliated with FTV Capital, and these third parties independently assess firms’ submitted performance based on multiple criteria. FTV Capital did not provide cash or non-cash compensation directly or indirectly in connection with obtaining or distributing this ranking. This award represents information as of a specific date and time and may not reflect important information related to an evaluation of the investment adviser, which has occurred prior to, or subsequent to, the award and may not be representative of a particular investor’s return. There is no guarantee that other rankings would reach the same conclusions.